Adrian Mannarino vs Mikael Ymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L L L
Form
W W W W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Mannarino 1 - 2 Ymer
They have played 6 sets in total, with Mannarino winning 2 and Ymer winning 4. The last match between Mannarino and Ymer was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 21-09-2022, First, I.hard with Mikael Ymer getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | 1 |
| Mikael Ymer | 2 |
Moselle Open - Metz(21-09-2022)
7
5
6
0
| Mannarino | Stats | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| 29% (7-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (7-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 124 | Ranking | 751 |
| 17 | Highest Rank | 50 |
| 36 | Age | 26 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 7 |
| 55% (680-562) | Career Total W/L | 63% (285-171) |
| $6,988,870 | Career Prize Money | $1,465,685 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Mikael Ymer
Player
Adrian Mannarino
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Mikael Ymer
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Adrian Mannarino
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 34 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:45:55 | Average Match Time | 1:45:55 |
| 58% (121/210) | 1st Serve % | 69% (142/206) |
| 56% (68/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (85/142) |
| 45% (40/89) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (31/64) |
| 52% (12/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
| 44% (90/206) | Return Points Win % | 49% (102/210) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adrian Mannarino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Adrian Mannarino
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Adrian Mannarino
43%
(
36 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Bernard Tomic
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
41%
(
33 of
80)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Aidan Mayo
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Adrian Mannarino
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(0) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mikael Ymer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (680/562) | Win/Loss | 63% (285/171) |
| 53% (1607/1415) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (648/476) |
| 51% (14719/14077) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5590/5041) |
| 57% (270/204) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (59/38) |
| 38% (80/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (101/67) |
| 59% (236/166) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (112/54) |
| 59% (94/64) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 4472 | Aces Total | 954 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2359 | Total Double Faults | 1248 |
| 1:15:56 | Average Match Time | 1:37:55 |
| 484.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 174.98 |
| 60% (43150/71685) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20600/31022) |
| 70% (30206/43150) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13449/20600) |
| 52% (14702/28535) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5056/10422) |
| 42% (2713/6448) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1471/3328) |
| 38% (27260/72053) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12690/30520) |
| 48% (64/68) | Slam W/L | 53% (19/17) |
| 42% (73/102) | Masters W/L | 48% (12/13) |
| 80% (8/2) | Cups W/L | 67% (16/8) |
| 51% (234/224) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (60/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (200/112) | Challenger W/L | 68% (122/57) |
| 65% (101/54) | Futures W/L | 78% (56/16) |
| 56% (626/1123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (265/412) |
| 45% (50/112) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 49% (208/421) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (61/122) |
| 53% (203/386) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (109/168) |
| 84% (657/552) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (253/224) |
| 16% (657/103) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (253/28) |
| 21% (584/124) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (203/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
